Edinburgh Edinburgh Rugby Supporters Club
The official forum for Edinburgh Rugby Supporters
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Team for this season
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Edinburgh Rugby Supporters Club Forum Index -> Edinburgh Rugby Forum
Author Message
Jon
World Cup Star


Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 907
Location: Balerno

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:22 pm    Post subject: Team for this season Reply with quote

This is my match day XV plus bench.....

15 Hugo Southwell
14 Mark Robertson
13 Ben Cairns
12 Nick DeLuca
11 Simon Webster
10 Chris Paterson
9 Mike Blair
1 Alan Jacobsen
2 Ross Ford
3 Geoff Cross
4 Jim Hamilton
5 Matt Mutschin
6 Allister Hogg Captain
7 Ross Rennie
8 David Callam

16 Andrew Kelly
17 Gavin Kerr
18 Ben Gissing
19 Alan MacDonald
20 Ben Meyer
21 Phil Godman
22 James Thompson

Not sure where this leaves Roly Reid, Andy Turnball, Calum McRae, John Houston, David Blair, Greig Laidlaw, Scott Newlands, Simon Cross and Craig Hamilton (before we even get on to the young uns!) but I guess they will all be needed with inuries and games during international seasons... not too bad a problem to have!
Back to top
kev
Established pro


Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 39
Location: Fife

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 12:29 am    Post subject: Re: Team for this season Reply with quote

Jon wrote:
This is my match day XV plus bench.....

15 Hugo Southwell
14 Mark Robertson
13 Ben Cairns
12 Nick DeLuca
11 Simon Webster
10 Chris Paterson
9 Mike Blair
1 Alan Jacobsen
2 Ross Ford
3 Geoff Cross
4 Jim Hamilton
5 Matt Mutschin
6 Allister Hogg Captain
7 Ross Rennie
8 David Callam

16 Andrew Kelly
17 Gavin Kerr
18 Ben Gissing
19 Alan MacDonald
20 Ben Meyer
21 Phil Godman
22 James Thompson

Not sure where this leaves Roly Reid, Andy Turnball, Calum McRae, John Houston, David Blair, Greig Laidlaw, Scott Newlands, Simon Cross and Craig Hamilton (before we even get on to the young uns!) but I guess they will all be needed with inuries and games during international seasons... not too bad a problem to have!


Looks pretty good Jon, though I'd swap Gissing and Mustchin, just personal preference.
It will be interesting to see where AR fits Paterson in, but I think I'd like to see Godman starting at 10 for at least the first few games with Paterson at 15 - either way I hope Paterson gets a decent run in one position rather than getting shoved from one position to the next around the back line as he does in the Scotland set-up.
I haven't seen enough of Robertson to put him ahead of Reid, Turnbull or Houston, but by all accounts he had a good Churchill Cup, so it will be good to see how he takes his chance as and when it comes along.
Back to top
ratty
World Cup Star


Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 288

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would agree. I think Godman has earn't the right to start at number 10 and he's in possession of the Scotland jersey at the moment. Hugo played well this season but still doesn't offer much in attack so I'd start with Paterson at 15.

I'd be quite happy rotating Turnbull and Houston into the threequarters as they are too good to warm the bench. Likewise Gissing, Hamilton and Mustchin will all perform to similar standards.

Agree with the rest, looks good....
Back to top
Crichton Gunner
World Cup Star


Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 465
Location: Midlothian

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to see....

15 Chris Paterson
14 Mark Robertson
13 Ben Cairns
12 Nick DeLuca
11 Simon Webster
10 Phil Godman
9 Mike Blair
1 Alan Jacobsen
2 Ross Ford
3 Geoff Cross
4 Jim Hamilton
5 Matt Mutschin
6 Alan MacDonald
7 Ross Rennie
8 Allister Hogg

16 Andrew Kelly
17 Gavin Kerr
18 Ben Gissing
19 David Callam
20 Ben Meyer
21 Calum MaCrae
22 James Thompson

That still leaves a lot of good players not even getting on the bench, but injuries and internationals will provide other opportunities. Personally, I'd rather see Hogg at 8 and MacDonald at 6, with Callam on the bench. I think that's a more dynamic back row. I'd also rather start with Godman at 10, as he has really developed his game in that position. He's excellent at bringing the other backs into the game, but could sometimes be more direct himself, and his kicking from hand still needs to improve. Thompson and MaCrae can cover full-back as well as centre or wing.

We have a very good looking squad this season, maybe still a bit lightweight in the forwards to compete at the very top, but nonetheless one that should be able to play some fast, attacking rugby. Roll on the start of the season!
Back to top
02ict328
One cap wonder


Joined: 06 Feb 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that the back row should be:
No 8- Hogg
Openside- Rennie
Blindside- either
Cross
Callum(even though he is a No Cool
Mutschin (could be a revelation, right size)

I think Macdonald is too much of an out an out openside!
Back to top
ratty
World Cup Star


Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 288

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mustchin has played a lot of rugby as a 6, but is more effective at lock despite his lack of height.
Back to top
djphilp
World Cup Star


Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 2931
Location: Too Far South

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have two positions that I can't yet make my mind up about and I have three players fighting for those two positions on the park. So here is my current thoughts...

15 Hugo Southwell/Chris Paterson

14 Simon Webster
13 Ben Cairns
12 Nick DeLuca
11 Mark Robertson

10 Chris Paterson/Phil Godman
9 Mike Blair

1 Alan Jacobsen
2 Ross Ford
3 Geoff Cross
4 Jim Hamilton
5 Ben Gissing
6 Matt Mustchin
7 Ross Rennie
8 Allister Hogg

16 Andrew Kelly
17 Gavin Kerr
18 Alan MacDonald
19 David Callam
20 Greig Laidlaw
21 Phil Godman/Hugo Southwell/Chris Paterson
22 Calum MacRae

This leaves some very talented players without a place in my squad but rugby being a contact sport I am sure tat they will get their chance due to injuries and it is a good thing that we have a real depth to the squad now and can fill almost any jersey with an equally talented replacement - excepting the front row perhaps - when injuries occur.
Back to top
ratty
World Cup Star


Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 288

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's an optimistic article in today's hootsman that suggests the improved financial footing of the SRU may mean a third pro team sooner than might have been thought possible. Looking at the players Edinburgh have that could be called a "second XV" it begins to get interesting.

15. Thompson
14. Reid
13. Easson
12. Macrae
11. Turnbull
10. Blair
9. Laidlaw
1. Grant
2. Kelly
3. Kerr
4. Turnbull
5. Mckenzie
6. Cross
7. Macdonald
8. Callam

I don't know enough about the Glasgow squad to comment on their Scottish squad members but the number of pro players begins to look pretty good. I appreciate it's a false economy but it's starting to look like a third team would be viable.

I suppose it comes down to what we want, two strong pro teams with great strength in depth or a maximum number of players being exposed to a good level of rugby.

The borders have provided some great young players but I would like to see a Caley team playing out of Perth or Stirling, thoughts?
Back to top
djphilp
World Cup Star


Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 2931
Location: Too Far South

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This may seem a little selfish but I'd rather have two strong teams who can truelly compete with the other ML, T14 and GP teams than have three teams who barely hold their own and during international spells and when injuries mount up get whipped out of sight.

There is a lot to be said for players having a winning mentality and feeling when they come together for Scotland duty.

And whilst the SRU debt may be decreasing it is still £15,000,000 and that is at least two too many 0's for my liking. Lets get the governing body into the black again and then look at increasing the number of pro teams. In the meantime why not set up a meaningful A team league with the other ML members with the apparent new riches that the SRU have as this would be the cheaper way to provide more players with meaningful game time.
Back to top
ratty
World Cup Star


Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 288

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I suppose I agree altough I would really like to see a third team. At the same time we are really going to have problems exposing a large number of players to game time.

There doesn't seem to be much of a loan market in rugby in the UK. Maybe I'm wrong on that but I can't see the reasons behind it. Grant was loaned out last season but didn't play a game.

As far as I can see there will be pretty limited scope for involvement this coming season for the likes of Grant, Crombie, Traynor, Turnbull, Newlands, Easson and Thompson just to name a few. Surely these guys would be better loaned to English clubs than playing club rugby here (although it would assist the club standard).

Is the London Scottish plan dead in the water?
Back to top
robdinsdale
Established pro


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 28
Location: Leith

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I suppose it comes down to what we want, two strong pro teams with great strength in depth or a maximum number of players being exposed to a good level of rugby.

The borders have provided some great young players but I would like to see a Caley team playing out of Perth or Stirling, thoughts?


Well, yes, there are a fair number of promising players on the fringes of at least the Edinburgh team now. I can't agree that it's the right time for a third pro team in Scotland though. We're all rightly optimistic about Edinburgh and the direction that it's going in, but at the moment neither Edinburgh or Glasgow are viable top level clubs in their own right and exist on what must be a high level of subsidy from the SRU. I imagine that our attendances will be larger next season, but compared to our competitors they will still be small and our ticket prices are at the bargain level, and we are not yet that well supported. It will take time to build a passionate, loyal and sizeable support, but a winning team can do this in a large city.

A Caledonian team may give some younger players some valuable experience, but in all likelihood you will be asking people to become interested in going to watch a team being consistently beaten (and this could extend to all three clubs if the playing resources are diluted enough). There is probably not that much benefit to the wider game in the eyes of the Scottish public if that is the case.

Two strong pro teams have a chance of making rugby popular in Scotland at a wider level, when traditionally people have only really been interested in the national team (for a 2 month period halfway through the season only). When that has happened, maybe there will be scope for a third team... or more!

As an aside, is rugby that much more popular in Perth or Stirling than football? The average attendance at St Johnstone is less than 3000 which would be small for a rugby team in the Celtic League...
Back to top
robdinsdale
Established pro


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 28
Location: Leith

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Is the London Scottish plan dead in the water?


Now that idea would work, I think.
Back to top
Baggage
World Cup Star


Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Posts: 3427

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

robdinsdale wrote:
Quote:
I suppose it comes down to what we want, two strong pro teams with great strength in depth or a maximum number of players being exposed to a good level of rugby.

The borders have provided some great young players but I would like to see a Caley team playing out of Perth or Stirling, thoughts?


Well, yes, there are a fair number of promising players on the fringes of at least the Edinburgh team now. I can't agree that it's the right time for a third pro team in Scotland though. We're all rightly optimistic about Edinburgh and the direction that it's going in, but at the moment neither Edinburgh or Glasgow are viable top level clubs in their own right and exist on what must be a high level of subsidy from the SRU. I imagine that our attendances will be larger next season, but compared to our competitors they will still be small and our ticket prices are at the bargain level, and we are not yet that well supported. It will take time to build a passionate, loyal and sizeable support, but a winning team can do this in a large city.

A Caledonian team may give some younger players some valuable experience, but in all likelihood you will be asking people to become interested in going to watch a team being consistently beaten (and this could extend to all three clubs if the playing resources are diluted enough). There is probably not that much benefit to the wider game in the eyes of the Scottish public if that is the case.

Two strong pro teams have a chance of making rugby popular in Scotland at a wider level, when traditionally people have only really been interested in the national team (for a 2 month period halfway through the season only). When that has happened, maybe there will be scope for a third team... or more!

As an aside, is rugby that much more popular in Perth or Stirling than football? The average attendance at St Johnstone is less than 3000 which would be small for a rugby team in the Celtic League...


We need at least one strong pro team, Edinburgh ( I don't give a Sh#@ about Glasgow), although if we are going to have two they both need to be competetive. That means squads of around 40 particularly because of the number of players we'll lose at international time.

Winning as you say will breed interest which will breed support and money and perhaps a little more TV coverage. Ideally we need to get big sponsors on board to give us the money to get a couple of big SH names, every time I see Mongomery I wonder how tf did he end up at Newport. If we could only get some money to get a that big front rower we need.

however many teams we have we need to make them inclusive to get as many supporters from all over the country following them, regardless of where they are based.

all I would say on the Saints attendances comment is what would they be if they were in the SPL??
Back to top
Derrick Lee's #1 Fan
World Cup Star


Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 1571
Location: Glasgow University, a smidgen to the west of the Tower

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Baggage wrote:
all I would say on the Saints attendances comment is what would they be if they were in the SPL??


They've definitely fallen on hard times since dropping out of the SPL. When I was there for the Scotland A v Ireland A game I overheard someone saying that they don't open the whole ground on match days any more, even when they're playing someone good.

As covered on another thread, a third team is a non-starter at the moment and I think will need to wait until Edinburgh and Glasgow are less dependent on central funding. If (I'd like to say "when" but you can't take anything for granted in Scottish rugby Sad) it does happen though I agree that it should be based in Caledonia district as the Borders demonstrated last time that they're not ready to host a district-wide professional rugby club.
Back to top
Baggage
World Cup Star


Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Posts: 3427

PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Derrick Lee's #1 Fan wrote:
it does happen though I agree that it should be based in Caledonia district as the Borders demonstrated last time that they're not ready to host a district-wide professional rugby club.


Brace Brace
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Edinburgh Rugby Supporters Club Forum Index -> Edinburgh Rugby Forum All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 


Powered by phpBB

Website Design and Development Cyberience Internet Solutions