Oldsalt wrote:Given Manu's comments does that mean the "non" professionals are back in charge at Edinburgh Rugby?
Have we written the league off already?
I'd actually pick Fowles ahead of Kennedy every time as to me he offers more all round in his game. Kennedy for me has not improved his game management at all over the past few years.
Psychologists are a big thing in NZ rugby, Dan Carter talks about them in his book - it's another reason they have an edge over everyone because not many other teams really bring them in. I think Manu's comments were not so much based at the players but the different rugby cultures between NZ and Scotland. It could be interesting to bring one in and see what that does.
I agree Kennedy and Tovey showed they are good for a broken up game but not so much when you need some structure and a plan B.
Also on the du Preez point; Manu, Bradbury and Mata have all been excellent and taken their chances so you can't drop them. When du Preez is given a chance he has to do the same.