joe soap wrote:frillage wrote:He didn't use it in a derogatory way, you read it in a derogatory way.
Journeyman is a very apt word to describe him, a solid, decent player but unspectacular and not deserving of higher honours.
he replied to your point with his first line the rest was carrying on his earlier post, no need to get upset!
jeez, a mind reader.
I've yet to see someone use journeyman in a complimentary way on a rugby forum, if you have, I'd be grateful for a link as I'm always happy to see new things.
anyway I'm not upset mate, I'm wondering where hp18 has seen enough of Atiga to make his decision.
Once again, every time you see journeyman written and you taking it as a negative has one thing in common, you.
I can reassure you, most people on here know what it means and it is an accurate description of Atiga, it would be an accurate description of Blackadder, even one of my favourites MM!
It is not a negative, every squad needs several journeymen, they also need genuine great players and some guys with potential to be a great for their country, like Scott, so the point stands, why paly a journeyman ahead of potentially our best 12 for almost a decade?
Relax mate, you come across as very chippy.